This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 1375–1387, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.139
Scheme 1: Structure of the dinuclear complexes [M2L(μ-L’)](ClO4) and representation of the structure of compl...
Figure 1: Ambidentate ligands with soft (–SH, –PPh2) and hard (–CO2H) donor functions.
Scheme 2: Synthesis of the complexes 6–8 (the doubly deprotonated macrocycle H2L is represented as an ellipse...
Figure 2: ORTEP (left) and van der Waals representations (right) of the molecular structure of the [Ni2L(O2C(...
Figure 3: Ball and stick (left) and van der Waals representations (right) of the molecular structure of the [...
Figure 4: Temperature dependence of the effective magnetic moment μeff (per dinuclear complex) for 7 (open tr...
Figure 5: AFM topography characteristics considering a 1 × 1 μm2 area, after deposition of [Ni2L(HL5)](ClO4) (...
Figure 6: Proposed binding mode of complex 7 to gold (left: van der Waals representation of the [Ni2L(L5)]+ c...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 789–800, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.82
Figure 1: Chemical structures of type I–IV complexes.
Figure 2: Expected J couplings between the central and terminal paramagnetic metal ions in type III/IV comple...
Scheme 1: Synthesis of the heterotrinuclear CuIINiIICuII type IV complexes 1–3.
Figure 3: ORTEP diagrams (50% ellipsoid probability) of the molecular structures of 1A (top), 2A (middle) and ...
Figure 4: Magnetization versus magnetic field M(H) of 1 at T = 1.8 K (symbols) together with the fit of M(H) ...
Figure 5: Magnetization versus magnetic field M(H) of 2 at T = 1.8 K (symbols) together with the fit of M(H) ...
Figure 6: Magnetization versus magnetic field M(H) of 3 at T = 1.8 K (symbols) together with the fit of M(H) ...
Figure 7: Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H and of the corresponding inverse susc...
Figure 8: Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H and of the corresponding inverse susc...
Figure 9: Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H and of the corresponding inverse susc...
Figure 10: Main panel: Difference between the calculated and measured static susceptibility for 3. Inset: Temp...